Modern China
May 2010; 36 (3): pp 243 – 362
Between Business and Bureaucrats: Pingtan Storytelling in Maoist and Post-Maoist China
Qiliang He
University of South Carolina Upstate, Spartanburg, SC, USA
Abstract:This article examines the complex relationship of the state, market, and artists in pingtan storytelling in post-1949 China. By focusing on Su Yuyin, a pingtan storyteller, and his performing career, this article explores the persistence of cultural markets after the Communist victory in 1949 and argues that the market continued to play a significant role in shaping China’s popular culture, which the government was keen on patronizing and politicizing. By comparing the regime’s management of pingtan storytelling before and after the Cultural Revolution (1966—1976), this article further argues that the regime’s censorship of popular culture in the 1950s and 1960s was handicapped by its lack of financial resources and the continued existence of cultural markets. The result was that censorship was not as strictly and efficiently enforced as has been assumed.
Between Tradition and Revolution: Fan Wenlan and the Origins of the Marxist Historiography of Modern China
Huaiyin Li
University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
Abstract:Focusing on the writings of Fan Wenlan, a leading historian in post-1949 China, this article examines the origins of the “revolutionary narrative” in the Marxist historiography of modern China in the context of political and intellectual struggles between the Nationalists and Communists and within the Communist Party in the 1930s and 1940s. The author argues that Fan’s new account of modern China emerged primarily as a product of the Communists’ resistance to the “modernization narrative” in Nationalist historiography. It was also a product of the Chinese Communists’ challenge to the “orthodox” Marxist interpretation of modern Chinese history prevailing in Russia and among Chinese Marxists in the 1920s and 1930s. But Fan’s background as a philologist, his poor training in Marxism, and his nationalist commitment greatly weakened his analysis of history from a Marxist perspective.
Informal Lenders and Rural Finance in China: A Report from the Field
Li Zhou
Renmin University of China, Beijing, China
Hiroki Takeuchi
Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, USA
Abstract:Chinese farmers need loans. It’s hard for them to borrow from formal lenders like banks or even the rural credit cooperatives. Thus, to satisfy their financial needs, farmers borrow from informal lenders. While farmers have benefited from the post-Mao reform in many respects, financial reforms of the past three decades have failed to create an effective system in which farmers can borrow from formal lenders. To create an effective and efficient financial system that can meet farmers’ needs, it is necessary for informal lenders to play an active role in rural finance. China’s rural finances face four key problems: asymmetric information, a lack of collateral, the unique structure of costs and risks, and the nonproductive use of loans. Informal lenders have an advantage in solving these problems. This article proposes the creation of a financial system in which informal lenders play an active role in lending to farmers and formal and informal lenders cooperate with each other. It develops the argument based on the first author’s field research in the provinces of Guangdong, Henan, Jilin, Shaanxi, Shandong, and Shanxi.
Maoist Discourse and the Mobilization of Emotions in Revolutionary China
Yu Liu
University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Abstract:This article focuses on how Maoist discourse engineered revolutionary emotions as a method of political mobilization. Based on personal memoirs and eyewitness accounts, it argues that the Maoist discourse can be disaggregated into three themes, each aimed at provoking one type of emotion: the theme of victimization, which mobilized indignation in struggle campaigns; the theme of redemption, which generated guilt in thought reform campaigns; and the theme of emancipation, which raised euphoria in social transformation campaigns. It also argues that Maoist discourse propagation employed three techniques——personalization, magnification, and moralization—and emphasizes that these techniques of propagation are as important as the content of the three themes in the production of passions.