中文摘要：
  在灾害管理研究领域，长期以来形成了“工程—技术”、“组织—制度”、“政治—社会”三种研究传统和与之相应的“灾害”、“危机”、“风险”三大核心概念。随着现实的发展，“灾害”概念在管理实践中逐渐被“突发事件”概念所取代。在风险、突发事件、危机这三个概念之间存在着内在的逻辑关系：一是风险与危机之间的潜在因果关系，二是突发事件将这种潜在的因果关系显性化。与此相应，应急管理也扩展为包括风险管理、危机管理在内的动态管理过程。这个分析框架可以对应急管理功能定位、应急预案绩效分析、治理结构优化、突发事件问责和群体性事件治理进行分析，以促进与完善中国的灾害管理。

 
英文摘要：
  An Analytical Framework of Disaster Management in the Context of China.Tong Xing and Zhang Haibo.The field of disaster management has gradually evolved three important research traditions characterized by projects vs. technology, organizations vs. institutions and politics vs. society, and three core concepts characterized by disaster, crisis and risk. With the passage of time, the term “disaster” has gradually been replaced by “emergency” in the practice of disaster management. However, there is a logical reason to argue that risk, emergency and crisis are intrinsically linked. It is argued that causality exists between risk and crisis, while emergency brings the latent causality to the surface. Accordingly, the implications of emergency management have also been extended to refer to risk management, crisis management and dynamic management. This analytical framework can play an effective role in positioning emergency management functions, measuring the effects of emergency management programs and optimizing their structure, promoting a system of accountability and managing social unrest at various levels. In this way, China’s disaster management skills can be upgraded.